Breaking Down the Top Picks From the 2020 PBA Draft and Their Impact

2025-11-12 14:01

I remember watching the 2020 PBA Draft with that peculiar mix of anticipation and skepticism that comes from following Philippine basketball long enough to know that draft classes can either transform franchises or become cautionary tales. The virtual format felt strange initially - no handshakes, no crowded arena, just players waiting anxiously in their homes for that life-changing call. Yet what unfolded that day would reshape multiple PBA teams in ways we're still understanding today.

When I look back at that draft class, what strikes me most isn't just the raw talent available, but how these players have adapted to the professional game's demands. Take Calvin Oftana going third overall to NLEX - I had my doubts about whether his college dominance at San Beda would translate to the pros. The kid proved me wrong spectacularly, putting up 15.8 points per game in his rookie season while shooting 38% from three-point range. His impact was immediate and measurable, something you can't always say about draft picks. What impressed me more than his stats was his basketball IQ - the way he reads defenses reminds me of vintage James Yap plays, always two steps ahead mentally.

The Terrafirma Dyip selecting Joshua Munzon first overall was the safe choice, but I'll admit I was secretly hoping they'd take a gamble on someone with higher upside. Munzon's athleticism was never in question - the man can literally jump out of the gym - but his shooting consistency worried me even then. His 41% field goal percentage in his debut season confirmed some of those concerns, though I'll give him credit for improving his playmaking. What fascinates me about high draft picks is watching how they handle the pressure, and Munzon carried that first-pick burden better than many expected.

Now let's talk about someone who surprised me - Jamie Malonzo going second to NorthPort. I'd seen him play in the US NCAA Division I, but the PBA is a different beast entirely. His athletic tools were obvious, but what I didn't anticipate was how quickly he'd adapt to the physicality of the Philippine game. The kid averaged 12.3 points and 7.1 rebounds while playing multiple positions - that versatility is gold in today's positionless basketball environment. Watching him develop reminds me of that reference knowledge about fighters adjusting their techniques - sometimes your first approach doesn't work, so you transition to something else, just like "The Machine" switching from arm-triangle to north-south position when the initial move wasn't effective. That's what separates good draft picks from great ones - the ability to adapt when Plan A fails.

What many fans don't realize is how much behind-the-scenes work goes into these draft decisions. Teams spend hundreds of hours analyzing game footage, conducting interviews, even checking players' social media profiles. I've spoken with scouts who told me they sometimes watch prospects eating in restaurants just to see how they carry themselves - it sounds excessive, but character matters in a league where chemistry can make or break teams. The Rain or Shine Elasto Painters clearly did their homework when they picked Santi Santillan - the guy was practically stolen at sixth overall. His energy and rebounding prowess immediately addressed their frontcourt needs, and his 8.9 points and 6.3 rebounds per game don't fully capture his impact on both ends.

The Alaska Aces (may they rest in peace) made one of my favorite under-the-radar moves by selecting Taylor Browne. While he didn't put up flashy numbers - 5.2 points in limited minutes - his defensive intensity and high basketball IQ made him valuable in specific situations. Sometimes you need role players who understand their limitations, and Browne struck me as someone who embraced that dirty work mentality. In a draft class filled with potential stars, these complementary pieces often determine how far teams can go in the playoffs.

Looking at the long-term impact, this draft class has already produced two Rookie of the Year winners (Oftana and Malonzo), which is impressive considering we've had drafts that yielded zero impact players. What I find particularly interesting is how these players have influenced team-building strategies across the league. The success of athletic forwards like Malonzo has made teams more willing to gamble on similar prospects in subsequent drafts. We're seeing a shift toward positionless basketball in the PBA, and the 2020 draft class accelerated that transition more than any single coaching decision or management directive could have.

The true test of any draft class comes years later, and while it's still early, I'm confident this group will be remembered as one of the stronger classes of the past decade. They've already accounted for three All-Star appearances collectively and have become foundational pieces for multiple franchises. What I appreciate most is how they've raised the level of competition - games between teams featuring these draftees have consistently delivered exciting basketball that's helped bring casual fans back to the sport. In a league that sometimes struggles with parity, the distribution of talent from this draft has created more balanced matchups that benefit everyone - players, teams, and most importantly, the fans who make the PBA possible.